彩票游戏

主機優惠
信息分享

hostus -KVM 2G內存 2核 洛杉磯vps主機簡單評測

在香港vps主機便宜貨盛行的時候,hostus早早上架香港節點讓其火了一把,現在hostus已經漸漸的淡出了部分伙伴們的眼中。近期hostus上架了新的一批母雞,開的小雞采用KVM架構,數據中心在洛杉磯、華盛頓兩個節點,在定價方面還是非常不錯的,即使不使用任何優惠碼,1G內存套餐月付7.95刀,還是具有一定的性價比。另外流量方面也還給的比較充足,最低512M內存套餐流量750G,端口為1000Mbps。在一上線的時候小七自己就入手購買了最低配置512M內存套餐,也對其進行了簡單的測試(hostus新KVM架構 512M內存 洛杉磯節點簡單測試)。今天申請到一款2G內存的小雞,主要還是看看大內存的小雞跑分會是怎么樣的一個狀態呢?嘿嘿!

hostus -KVM 2G內存 2核  洛杉磯vps主機簡單評測-彩票游戏

優惠碼:KVMRELAUNCH30 ? 老用戶專用,首次折扣30%優惠,沒什么實際意義。以下方案為折扣前價格,另外KVM架構,支持安裝windows系統,建議1G或以上內存安裝使用。官方提供的win系統需要2G內存以上的小雞!

優惠方案

  • 核心:1核CPU
  • 內存:512MB
  • 硬盤:15GB
  • 流量:750GB
  • 端口:1Gbps
  • 架構:KVM
  • 價格:$4.35/month
  • 傳送:
  • 核心:2核CPU
  • 內存:1GB
  • 硬盤:30GB
  • 流量:1TB
  • 端口:1Gbps
  • 架構:KVM
  • 價格:$7.95/month
  • 傳送:
  • 核心:2核CPU
  • 內存:2GB
  • 硬盤:55GB
  • 流量:2TB
  • 端口:1Gbps
  • 架構:KVM
  • 價格:$13.95/month
  • 傳送:

測試環境與配置:centos系統,官方原版;配置2核CPU ?2G內存 ;洛杉磯節點

1、基本硬件配置

[root@7vps ~]# free -m
 total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1877 135 1741 0 27 39
-/+ buffers/cache: 68 1808
Swap: 1023 0 1023
[root@7vps ~]# df -hal
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda3 53G 813M 50G 2% /
proc 0 0 0 - /proc
sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys
devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts
tmpfs 939M 0 939M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/vda1 477M 57M 395M 13% /boot
none 0 0 0 - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
[root@7vps ~]# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 2
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 2
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 63
Stepping: 2
CPU MHz: 2399.996
BogoMIPS: 4799.99
Virtualization: VT-x
Hypervisor vendor: KVM
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 4096K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1

2G內存,默認1G swap,還算是不錯啦!另外KVM給了2核,CPU也是當前流行的主流配置!

2、網絡測試

[root@7vps ~]# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2016-05-14 09:10:26-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.test”

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 97.4M/s in 1.0s

2016-05-14 09:10:27 (97.4 MB/s) - “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]

[root@7vps ~]# wget http://down.360.cn/360sd/360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe
--2016-05-14 09:10:35-- http://down.360.cn/360sd/360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe
Resolving down.360.cn... 59.37.80.20, 175.6.229.77
Connecting to down.360.cn|59.37.80.20|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 37480360 (36M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe”

100%[======================================>] 37,480,360 8.51M/s in 6.5s

2016-05-14 09:10:43 (5.53 MB/s) - “360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe” saved [37480360/37480360]

國外常規測試下載速度達到97M/s的速度,的確是G口,下載國內的360也能達到8M/s,也是不錯的啦!

3、硬盤IO性能

[root@7vps ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.88487 s, 69.1 MB/s
[root@7vps ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.91755 s, 92.0 MB/s

硬盤性能還是不錯的,對于流量幾千IP的來說夠用了,當然如果您的程序非常占IO也是么辦法的。國內的阿里云、騰訊云。西數等硬盤IO一般,特別是華夏小云硬盤IO性能更低,對于小站足夠使用,當然流量上萬IP建議直接上高配置的服務器啦!

4、站長網ping測速

hostus -KVM 2G內存 2核  洛杉磯vps主機簡單評測-彩票游戏

5、無聊的跑分

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 14 2016 10:38:04 - 11:06:16
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29132129.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3132.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3710.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 788213.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 213018.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1672111.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1591584.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 304956.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10003.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5731.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1238.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2207672.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29132129.4 2496.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3132.2 569.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 3710.4 862.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 788213.9 1990.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 213018.3 1287.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1672111.4 2883.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1591584.4 1279.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 304956.7 762.4
Process Creation 126.0 10003.5 793.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5731.8 1351.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1238.6 2064.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2207672.7 1471.8
 ========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1323.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 14 2016 11:06:16 - 11:34:28
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 57209973.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6247.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8063.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 908645.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 250265.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2363073.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3100104.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 604849.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20494.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9327.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1259.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3523500.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 57209973.3 4902.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6247.9 1136.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 8063.2 1875.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 908645.3 2294.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 250265.0 1512.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2363073.1 4074.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3100104.5 2492.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 604849.3 1512.1
Process Creation 126.0 20494.9 1626.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9327.5 2199.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1259.2 2098.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3523500.8 2349.0
 ========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2151.1

性能還是非常不錯的,2核2G內存套餐跑分超過2000分是相當不錯的啦!對于KVM架構適合建站的朋友,當然玩個人上網服務也是不錯的!對于ping的測試小七也是在高峰期ping還能平均在200左右還是不錯的,hostus洛杉磯線路目前走的是亞洲優化段,經香港鏈接大陸,當然與所謂的電信直連之類的還是有點點差別!國外線路在高峰期不管那條或多或少延遲較高,部分丟包率也高,這些都是無法避免的!

贊(5)
歡迎轉載:彩票游戏 » hostus -KVM 2G內存 2核 洛杉磯vps主機簡單評測
分享到: 更多 (0)